Herdenschutz?

In der Natur und im Fach Biologie kennt man keinen sog. Herdenschutz oder sog. Herdenimmunität!

Die Theorie, daß keine Krankheiten mehr ausbrechen, wenn fast alle (> 90 %) oder alle Teile der Bevölkerung geimpft sind, wurde von den Impfgläubigen erfunden, um zu vertuschen, daß Impfungen nichts nützen und nicht schützen und auch und im Gegenteil oft gerade die Geimpften krank werden und zudem noch zusätzlich neue Krankheiten bekommen.

Dies bestätigte auch Prof. H. L. Sänger in einem Brief an eine besorgte Mutter bereits am 14.10.1996, der Professor für Molekularbiologie und Direktor der Abteilung für Viroidforschung am Max-Planck-Institut für Biochemie in Martinsried bei München war.

Vor 20 Jahren war dies den Insidern also schon klar! Das wurde dem Fußvolk aber nie mitgeteilt – und auch die Qualitätsjournalisten haben nie recherchiert bzw. es nie veröffentlicht!

Herdenschutz? Herdenschutz?

Fotos: Privat.

Abschrift

Prof. Heinz Ludwig Sänger
Max-Planck-Institut für Biochemie
82152 Martinsried bei München
14.10.1996

Sehr geehrte *******

Vielen Dank für Ihren Brief vom 10.10.1996, in dem Sie Ihre kritische Einstellung zum Impfproblem beschreiben. Sie haben völlig recht mit Ihrem Empfinden, daß angesichts des enormen Drucks durch die Schulmedizin und die Bevölkerung eine ganze Menge Standvermögen nötig ist, um ein Kind nicht impfen zu lassen. Aus der praktischen Erfahrung läßt sich ganz klar schließen, daß die subtilen Impfschäden, die ja oft erst nach vielen Jahren in Form von erhöhter Anfälligkeit und diversen Verhaltensstörungen auftreten, natürlich nicht mit stattgefundenen Impfungen in Zusammenhang gebracht werden. Eine der einfachsten Regeln für verunsicherte Eltern ist es, alle Ärzte, die die Impfung dringend empfehlen, zu fragen, ob sie garantieren können, daß keine Folgeschäden auftreten. Ich möchte den Arzt sehen, der in der Lage ist Ihnen dies schriftlich zu geben. Im übrigen ist es sehr verwunderlich, daß die Eltern von geimpften Kindern große Angst vor solchen Kindern haben die nicht geimpft wurden. Auch hier muß man sich fragen, woher diese Angst kommt, da doch geimpften Kindern gar nichts passieren sollte.

Nachdem Sie die Bücher von Dr. Buchwald gelesen haben, sind Sie hinreichend informiert, denn es hat kaum jemand besser als er diese Problematik dargestellt. Für Ihre weitere Urteilsfindung füge ich Ihnen einen Aufsatz von Dr. Graf bei, in dem die gesamte Problematik der gegenwärtigen schulmedizinischen Behandlung von Kindern in so ausgezeichneter Weise dargestellt ist, daß ich dem nichts hinzuzufügen brauche. Wenn schon ein Arzt keine Verantwortung übernehmen will für die absolute Sicherheit einer Impfung und für das Ausbleiben von jederzeit möglichen Folgeschäden, so kann er jedenfalls sagen, daß er das z. Zt. allgemein akzeptierte Verfahren mit gutem Gewissen empfiehlt. So bleibt Ihnen eigentlich nur noch übrig selbst diese Verantwortung für Ihr Kind zu übernehmen, denn Sie werden niemanden finden der dies für Sie tun kann. Vor allem aber sollten Sie sich kein schlechtes Gewissen einreden lassen, denn so etwas kann negative Folgen für Ihre Gesamteinstellung mit sich bringen und zu Prophezeiungen führen, die sich schließlich selbst erfüllen. Das Problem vor dem Sie stehen ist die Abwägung zwischen den möglichen Krankheiten und deren Folgen und den Impfungen und Impffolgen. Bedenken Sie dabei, daß die meisten geimpften Kinder trotz der Impfung danach die entsprechenden Krankheiten durchmachen, die oft in maskierter und keineswegs weniger gefährlicher Form auftreten. Sie sollten alles tun, um die Gesundheit Ihres Kindes zu fördern und seine Selbstheilungsfähigkeit zu unterstützen.

Was die Bedeutung der Mikroben als Ursache von Krankheiten betrifft, so hat Pasteur am Ende seines Lebens erkennen müssen: “Die Bazillen sind nichts, das Terrain ist alles”, und Jenner war sich in den letzten Jahren seines Lebens auch nicht mehr sicher, ob er mit seiner Pockenimpfung wirklich nur Segen für die Menschheit gestiftet hat. Ich wundere mich immer wieder, daß sich die Schulmedizin so sicher ist, daß die möglichst totale Durchimpfung der Bevölkerung der Weg zur Förderung der Volksgesundheit ist.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Dr. Heinz Ludwig Sänger
Professor für Molekularbiologie
Direktor der Abteilung Viroidforschung

Obiger Brief vom Virologen Prof. Sänger 1996 an eine impfkritische Mutter über Zweifel an Herdenschutz und Mikroben als Krankheitsursache der Schulmediziner.

Prof. Sänger war auch in der AIDS-Virus-Kritik engagiert, siehe hier:

http://neue-medizin.com/dieexist.htm#saenger1. Er verstarb ca. 2011.


Weiterführend:

Masern, Impfungen und die „Herdenimmunität”

von HP René Gräber

„Ist das nicht der Wahnsinn? „Eine Impfung, die nur dann wirkt, wenn 99 Prozent in ihren Genuss gekommen sind! Wie kann mein Immunsystem wissen, dass die anderen 98 Leute um mich herum auch geimpft sind, damit es durch die Impfung einen Schutz aufbaut? Warum wirkt diese Impfung nicht bei jedem Einzelnen, unabhängig davon, ob 99 oder wie auch immer wieviel Prozent die Impfung bekommen haben?“
http://naturheilt.com/blog/masern-impfungen-herdenimmunitaet-2015/


HERD IMMUNITY FROM VACCINES IS SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE: MANY LINKS

Sandy Lunoe, 31. März 2016

HERD IMMUNITY LINKS Feb 2016 (sl)

http://sanevax.org/vaccines-and-the-myth-of-herd-immunity/
Polk Moms.com: Herd immunity from vaccines is nothing more than vaccine quotas 
http://www.h4cblog.com/vaccines-and-the-myth-of-herd-immunity http://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/13047873.Mumps_vaccination_programme_jeopardises_male_fertility_rates/
http://vaccinechoicecanada.com/about-vaccines/general-issues/herd-immunity/herd-immunity-the-misplaced-driver-of-universal-vaccination/
http://www.vacfacts.info/the-false-theory-of-vaccine-derived—herd-immunity.html http://www.naturalnews.com/035024_vaccine_exemptions_children_infectious_disease.html http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/The-Herd-Immunity-Theory-Treating-Our-Children-Like-Cattle
http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/07/05/herd-immunity-the-flawed-science-and-failures-of-mass-vaccination-suzanne-humphries-md-3/
https://thepeopleschemist.com/reasons-dont-vaccinate-children-vaccine-supporters-shouldnt-give/
http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/if-you-are-in-support-of-vaccinations/
http://vactruth.com/2010/01/31/forced-vaccinations-government-and-the-public-interest/
http://www.wellwithin1.com/herdimmunity.htm (many links)
http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/the-herd-immunity-myth-and-how-it-pits-parent-against-parent/ http://vaxtruth.org/2012/05/measles-mumps-and-zombies-oh-my/
http://www.whale.to/a/herd.html http://naturalsociety.com/exposing-vaccination-for-immunity-fraud/ http://www.sott.net/article/252159-The-entire-vaccine-industry-is-being-exposed-for-unproven-assumptions-and-misrepresentations-of-data https://nyinjeksjon.wordpress.com/2012/03/02/kan-man-stille-sporsmal-vedrorende-vaksinering-mot-meslinger/ (Norwegian) http://www.rolfkenneth.no/Vax-E_Flokkimmunitet.html (Norwegian)
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10150170317093998.359926.69667273997

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/bioethicist-parents-should-be-held-liabel-deaths-caused-unvaccinated-children

http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/herd-immunity-three-reasons-why-i-dont-vaccinate-my-children-and-why-vaccine-supporters-shouldnt-care/
http://www.cancertruth.net/2013-september-newsletter/#sthash.FMd5AGl7.dpbs
http://www.naturalnews.com/048770_MMR_vaccine_measles_immune_damage.html#ixzz3StGyBHh7
http://vaccineimpact.com/2013/mmr-vaccinations-abject-failure-in-measles-and-mumps/
http://business.financialpost.com/fp-comment/junk-science-week-vaccinating-the-herd
http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/02/18/the-deadly-impossibility-of-herd-immunity-through-vaccination-by-dr-russell-blaylock/
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/herd-immunity-myth-or-reality http://sanevax.org/herd-immunity-fact-or-fiction/
https://leviquackenboss.wordpress.com/2015/02/23/20-things-i-wish-vaccine-junkies-would-admit/ http://www.naturalnews.com/048770_MMR_vaccine_measles_immune_damage.html#ixzz3StGyBHh7
http://blog.realhealthtalk.com/heard-of-herd-immunity/
http://www.jeremyrhammond.com/2015/07/05/a-measles-death-vaccines-and-the-medias-failure-to-inform/
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/14/expert-pediatrician-exposes-vaccine-myths.aspx
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/11/13/vaccines-and-herd-immunity-nonsense/ http://sanevax.org/u/2015/05/Herd-Immunity-.pdf

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: The Truth About Vaccines Can’t Be Hidden Much Longer

http://voiceforvaccinerealism.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/what-about-herd_17.html
https://thereisnoherdimmunity.wordpress.com/2016/02/01/vaccine-induced-herd-immunity-is-scientifically-impossible/


Dr. Andrew Wakefield: Vaccination Destroys Natural Herd Immunity and Weakens The Population

Die Impfpflicht wird mit dem Erreichen einer Herdenimmunität begründet, um diejenigen zu schützen, die nicht geimpft werden können. Dr. Andrew Wakefield erklärt hier, daß diese Hypothese falsch ist, da Impfungen die natürliche Herdenimmunität zerstören und die Volksgesundheit schwächen!


Herdenschutz? Nie bewiesen, aber großes Druckmittel!
Schulausschluss? Rechtlich fraglich! 

Der neue impf-report Nr. 107 klärt auf! Als Heft oder pdf bestellbar! Kostengünstig! Auch gut zum Verteilen geeignet! Mengenrabatt auf Anfrage beim Verlag!

Foto: impf-report. Mit freundlicher Genehmigung.
Foto: impf-report. Mit freundlicher Genehmigung.

The Theory of Herd Immunity

Herdenschutz?

Foto: Informed Choice Iowa, fair use.

 
Many people misunderstand how the theory of herd immunity applies to vaccines. In 1933 A. W. Hedrich conducted a study regarding measles outbreaks in Boston between 1900 and 1930. He discovered that measles outbreaks were suppressed when 68% of the children in the population had contracted the actual virus. Meaning that ‘herd immunity’ was originally a term coined based off those who had naturally acquired immunity to a virus or bacteria, it was not a term original to vaccination.

 

Consequently, the theory has been “bait-and-switched” by the health industry to apply to vaccine-induced antibody production. Attempting to apply the herd immunity theory to vaccines is problematic, the following examples outline the holes in it’s application:

Vaccine Failure (which we discussed in yesterday’s Vaccine Factmas): Outbreaks of vaccine “preventable” diseases have been documented in highly, if not fully, vaccinated populations numerous times making it another hole in the theory of herd immunity. You can read about some of these cases on the ‘Shedding and Asymptomatic Transmission’ tab at www.vaccine.guide

Adult Vaccination Rates: Low adult vaccination rates are another interesting hole in the theory of herd immunity. Adult vaccination rates are constantly short of meeting the “herd” required standards and yet we don’t see the mass outbreaks among the adult populations as before. One interesting observation is that it’s possible we don’t see the mass outbreaks among the older populations because many of them naturally acquired the disease (such as measles) when they were younger and they are providing the true herd immunity Hedrich found in his study.

“As of 2017, the government estimates that children make up 22.6% of the U.S. population, meaning a whopping 77.4% of the U.S. population is adults. The CDC acknowledges that national vaccination rates in adults are extremely low and that, for most adult-recommended vaccines, coverage is somewhere in the 20 – 30% range.” https://www.texansforvaccinechoice.com/online/challenging-what-youve-heard-about-the-herd/

This article from Texans for Vaccine Choice is terrific and goes into much more sourced and cited details than we can cover here – it is well worth a full read!

Herd immunity and Immune Compromised Individuals: Almost all choices have the potential to affect someone else and all decent human beings strive to help others achieve optimal health. When we consider the points mentioned above and in previous “Factmas” posts, we know a vaccinated individual who becomes infected with pertussis can have suppressed symptoms and unknowingly transmit the illness to others. It would be terrible for someone to spread the illness without even knowing they are sick. Contrary to an individual with the naturally acquired illness will exhibit symptoms, they will know they are sick and should stay home to get well. Additionally, we discussed above that most adults are not up to date on their vaccinations making it statistically inaccurate for the immunocompromised population to be protected by the vaccinated herd theory protection.

Vaccine Compromised Individuals: Numerous individuals have experienced adverse reactions to vaccines or have been injured by them. As a result, this population also can no longer receive vaccines safely.

Immunity Education Group could not have said it better: “Not a single word is spoken about a fast-growing population of children injured by pharmaceutical side effects—adverse reactions that parents are supposed to be warned about when their doctor gives them informed consent, but no doctor ever does. Things like seizures, paralysis, and neurological disorders. These are the same reactions that doctors ignore, pretend can’t happen, or write off as “coincidental,” despite being listed very clearly in the pharmaceutical company’s product warnings. Vaccine-compromised children are the victims whose parents followed the rules without questioning, and paid the price.” https://immunityeducationgroup.org/immunocompromised-what-about-the-vaccinecompromised

Stay tuned for more information on vaccine injuries later this week.

The Impact of Low Vaccine Rates: When evaluating each illness covered by a vaccine on the schedule, we can observe what the true impact of low vaccine rates. Follow the link for a more in-depth observation:
https://immunityeducationgroup.org/what-would-happen-if-too-many-people-stopped-vaccinating

And some extra places to read more Herdenschutz?

https://vaccine.guide/effectiveness-outbreaks-herd-immunity/herd-immunity/herd-immunity-and-compulsory-vaccination-does-the-theory-justify-the-law/

https://kellybroganmd.com/herd-immunity-fact-fiction/
We encourage parents to fully inform themselves before making their decision regarding vaccinations. Be informed when it comes to making medical decisions for you and your family.

Stay tuned for the rest of Vaccine Factmas Herdenschutz? Happy researching!

Did you miss the other days of Vaccine Factmas? You can find them all here as they come out linktr.ee/InformedChoiceIowa

 
– Quelle: Informed Choice Iowa, Facebook-Chronik vom 16.12.2019.
 

Vaccines and the Myth of “Herd Immunity”
 
Herdenschutz?
Foto: h4cblog.com, fair use.

Forced Vaccinations, Government, and the Public Interest
By Dr. Russell Blaylock, M.D.

December 2009

Those who are observant have noticed a dangerous trend in the United States, as well as worldwide, and that is the resorting of various governments at different levels to mandating forced vaccination upon the public at large. My State of Mississippi has one of the most-restrictive vaccine-exemption laws in the United States, where exemptions are allowed only upon medical recommendation. Ironically, this is only on paper, as many have had as many as three physicians, some experts in neurological damage caused by vaccines, provide written calls for exemption, only to be turned down by the State’s public-health officer.

Worse are the States, such as Massachusetts, New Jersey and Maryland, where forced vaccinations have either been mandated by the courts, the state legislature, or have such legislation pending. All of such policies strongly resemble those policies found in National Socialist empires, Stalinist countries, or Communist China.

When public-health officers are asked for the legal justification for such draconian measures as forcing people to accept vaccines that they deem either a clear and present danger to themselves and their loved ones or have had personal experience with serious adverse reactions to such vaccines, they usually resort to the need to protect the public.

One quickly concludes that if the vaccines are as effective as being touted by the public-health officials, then why should one fear the unvaccinated? Obviously the vaccinated would have at least 95% protection. This question puts them in a very difficult position. Their usual response is that a “small” percentage of the vaccinated will not have sufficient protection and would still be at risk. Now, if they admit what the literature shows, that vaccine failure rates are much higher than the 5% they claim, they must face the next obvious question – then why should anyone take the vaccine if there is a significant chance it will not protect?

When pressed further, they then resort to their favorite justification, the Holy Grail of the vaccine proponents – herd immunity. This concept is based upon the idea that 95% (and some now say 100%) of the population must be vaccinated to prevent an epidemic. The percentages needing vaccination grows progressively. I pondered this question for some time before the answer hit me. Herd immunity is mostly a myth and applies only to natural immunity – that is, contracting the infection itself.

Is Herd Immunity Real?

In the original description of herd immunity, the protection to the population at large occurred only if people contracted the infections naturally. The reason for this is that naturally-acquired immunity lasts for a lifetime. The vaccine proponents quickly latched onto this concept and applied it to vaccine-induced immunity. But, there was one major problem – vaccine-induced immunity lasted for only a relatively short period, from 2 to 10 years at most, and then this applies only to humoral immunity. This is why they began, silently, to suggest boosters for most vaccines, even the common childhood infections such as chickenpox, measles, mumps, and rubella.

Then they discovered an even greater problem, the boosters were lasting for only 2 years or less. This is why we are now seeing mandates that youth entering colleges have multiple vaccines, even those which they insisted gave lifelong immunity, such as the MMR. The same is being suggested for full-grown adults. Ironically, no one in the media or medical field is asking what is going on. They just accept that it must be done.

That vaccine-induced herd immunity is mostly myth can be proven quite simply. When I was in medical school, we were taught that all of the childhood vaccines lasted a lifetime. This thinking existed for over 70 years. It was not until relatively recently that it was discovered that most of these vaccines lost their effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being given. What this means is that at least half the population, that is the baby boomers, have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. In essence, at least 50% or more of the population was unprotected for decades.

If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent massive epidemics should the vaccination rate fall below 95%. Yet, we have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with 50% or less of the population having vaccine protection. That is, herd immunity has not existed in this country for many decades and no resurgent epidemics have occurred. Vaccine-induced herd immunity is a lie used to frighten doctors, public-health officials, other medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations.

When we examine the scientific literature, we find that for many of the vaccines protective immunity was 30 to 40%, meaning that 70% to 60% of the public has been without vaccine protection. Again, this would mean that with a 30% to 40% vaccine-effectiveness rate combined with the fact that most people lost their immune protection within 2 to 10 year of being vaccinated, most of us were without the magical 95% number needed for herd immunity. This is why vaccine defenders insist the vaccines have 95% effectiveness rates.

Without the mantra of herd immunity, these public-health officials would not be able to justify forced mass vaccinations. I usually give the physicians who question my statement that herd immunity is a myth a simple example. When I was a medical student almost 40 years ago, it was taught that the tetanus vaccine would last a lifetime. Then 30 years after it had been mandated, we discovered that its protection lasted no more than 10 years. Then, I ask my doubting physician if he or she has ever seen a case of tetanus? Most have not. I then tell them to look at the yearly data on tetanus infections – one sees no rise in tetanus cases. The same can be said for measles, mumps, and other childhood infections. It was, and still is, all a myth.

The entire case for forced mass vaccination rest upon this myth and it is important that we demonstrate the falsity of this idea. Neil Z. Miller, in his latest book The Vaccine Information Manual, provides compelling evidence that herd immunity is a myth.

The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions

Those pushing mandatory vaccination for an ever-growing list of diseases are a mixed bag. Some are quite sincere and truly want to improve the health of the United States. They believe the vaccine-induced herd immunity myth and likewise believe that vaccines are basically effective and safe. These are not the evil people.

A growing number are made of those with a collectivist worldview and see themselves as a core of elite wise men and women who should tell the rest of us what we should do in all aspects of our lives. They see us as ignorant cattle, who are unable to understand the virtues of their plan for America and the World. Like children, we must be made to take our medicine – since, in their view, we have no concept of the true benefit of the bad-tasting medicine we are to be fed.

I have also found that a small number of people in the regulatory agencies and public health departments would like to speak out but are so intimidated and threatened with dismissal or destruction of their careers, that they remain silent. As for the media, they are absolutely clueless.

I have found that “reporters” (we have few real journalists these days) rarely understand what they are reporting on and always trust and rely upon people in positions of official power, even if those people are unqualified to speak on the subject. Most of the time they run to the Centers for Disease Control or medical university to seek answers. I cannot count the number of times I have seen university department heads interviewed when it was obvious they had no clue as to the subject being discussed. Few such professors will pass up an opportunity to appear on camera or be quoted in a newspaper.

One must also appreciate that such reporters and editors are under an enormous economic strain, as vaccine manufacturers are major advertisers in all media outlets and for an obvious reason – it controls content. A number of excellent stories on such medical subjects are spiked every day. That means we will always be relegated to the “fringe media” as our media outlets are called. Despite the high quality of the journalism in many of the “fringe” outlets, they have a much smaller audience. And despite this we are having an enormous effect on the debate.

As the Public Awakens, the Collectivist Becomes Desperate

John Jewkes, in his book Ordeal by Planning, observed that as the British collectivists began to see opposition rise to their grandiose plans, they became more desperate and aggressive in their reaction. They then initiated a campaign of smearing their opponents and blaming every failure on the unwillingness of the people to accept the planner’s dictates without question. We certainly have seen this in this debate –opponents to forced vaccinations are referred to as fringe scientists, kooks, uneducated, confused, and enemies of public safety – reminiscent of Stalin’s favorite phrase, “enemy of the people.”

This desperation is based upon their fear that the public might soon catch on to the fact that the entire vaccine program is based upon nonsense, fear, and concocted fairy tales. One special fear of theirs is that the public might discover the fact that most vaccines are contaminated with a number of known and yet-to-be discovered viruses, bacteria, viral fragments, and DNA/RNA fragments. And, further, that our science demonstrates that these contaminants could lead to a number of slowly-developing degenerative diseases, including degenerative diseases of the brain. This is rarely discussed but is of major importance in this debate.

As the Public Awakens, the Collectivist Becomes Desperate

John Jewkes, in his book Ordeal by Planning, observed that as the British collectivists began to see opposition rise to their grandiose plans, they became more desperate and aggressive in their reaction. They then initiated a campaign of smearing their opponents and blaming every failure on the unwillingness of the people to accept the planner’s dictates without question. We certainly have seen this in this debate –opponents to forced vaccinations are referred to as fringe scientists, kooks, uneducated, confused, and enemies of public safety – reminiscent of Stalin’s favorite phrase, “enemy of the people.”

This desperation is based upon their fear that the public might soon catch on to the fact that the entire vaccine program is based upon nonsense, fear, and concocted fairy tales. One special fear of theirs is that the public might discover the fact that most vaccines are contaminated with a number of known and yet-to-be discovered viruses, bacteria, viral fragments, and DNA/RNA fragments. And, further, that our science demonstrates that these contaminants could lead to a number of slowly-developing degenerative diseases, including degenerative diseases of the brain. This is rarely discussed but is of major importance in this debate.

The idea that adults and their children would be forced to submit to being injected with dozens of these organisms and organic fragments is terrifying. No regulatory agency is tracking to see if chronic diseases are rising in the vaccinated, yet we have compelling evidence of a massive rise in all autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, and certain cancers since the advent of a dramatic increase in the number of vaccines being mandated.

Of special concern is the finding that many of the contaminant organisms can pass from generation to generation. For example, new studies have found that SV-40, a major contaminant of the polio vaccine until 1963, not only existed as a latent virus for the lifetime of those exposed to the vaccine but was being passed on to the next generation, primarily by way of sperm, something called vertical transmission. This means that every generation from now on will be infected with this known carcinogenic virus. There is also compelling evidence that some polio vaccines manufactured after 1963 may contain SV-40 virus.

What makes the SV-40 contamination disaster of such concern is its association with so many cancers – including mesothelioma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, meningioma, astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, pituitary adenoma, glioblastoma, osteosarcomas, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, papillary thyroid carcinomas, and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas.

The Federal government has gone to enormous lengths to cover up this association, despite the powerful scientific evidence that this vaccine infected at least a hundred million people worldwide with this carcinogenic virus. And, it took over 40 years just to get this far. Linking vaccine contaminations and immunoexcitotoxicity to the drastic rise in neurodegenerative diseases will probably take even longer because of the widespread growth of entrenched powers high in government and their control of the media, which is equally extensive. The fact that powerful, enormously wealthy foundations, such as the Ford Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Rockefeller series of foundations, are supporting forced vaccination greatly enhances the power of governments all over the World.

These foundations operate in the shadows, influencing legislation and government actions through the World Health Organization and individual governmental bodies. Behind every call for forced vaccinations, mandated quarantines, and home invasions, one can find one of these foundations providing the money as well as experts. Remember, the largest of the pharmaceutical-vaccine manufacturers are also providing much of the money for the foundations and serving on the boards of these foundations. The Rockefellers either owned outright or had controlling interest in all of the major pharmaceutical companies. This has given them absolute and extremely powerful access to the reins of power at all levels. Yet, they can be defeated by the truth.

Dr. Blaylock is a board-certified neurosurgeon, author and lecturer. He attended the LSU School of Medicine in New Orleans, Louisiana and completed his internship and neurosurgical residency at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, South Carolina. For the past 24 years he has practiced neurosurgery in addition to having a nutritional practice for 2 years. Retiring from his neurosurgical practice to devote full time to nutritional studies and research, Dr. Blaylock has written and illustrated three books (Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, Health and Nutrition Secrets That Can Save Your Life, and Natural Strategies for The Cancer Patient). In addition, he has written and illustrated three chapters in medical textbooks, written a booklet on nutritional protection against biological terrorism, has an e-booklet on radioprotection (Nuclear Sunrise), written and illustrated a booklet on multiple sclerosis, and written over 30 scientific papers in peer-reviewed journals.

Other credits include Dr. Blaylock’s DVD Nutrition & Behavior, a CD-ROM on the Truth About Aspartame, and, for the past five years, a health newsletter The Blaylock Wellness Report, published by NewsMax. Since the publication of his first book, he has been a guest on over 100 syndicated radio and television programs and appeared on the 700 Club seven times. He lectures widely to both lay and professional medical audiences on a variety of nutritional subjects.

Dr. Blaylock is a visiting professor of biology at Belhaven College and serves on the editorial staff of the Journal of the American Nutraceutical Association, the editorial staff of the Fluoride Journal and is on the editorial staff of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, official journal of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. He is also a regular lecturer for the Fellowship for Anti-aging and Regenerative Medicine.

– Quellen:
thenhf.com
h4cblog.com


Foto: Andrea L. Mit freundlicher Genehmigung.
Foto: Andrea L. Mit freundlicher Genehmigung.

Impfgläubige in Deutschland bezeichnen im Zusammenhang mit dem frei erfunden “Herdenschutz” ungeimpfte, d. h. impf-freie Kinder schon als Bio-Terroristen, weil sie nicht impfvergiftet sind! Daß der Herdenschutz bzw. die Herdenimmunität nicht existiert, zeigen wir am Beispiel der Maserninzidenz.


Das Märchen vom Herdenschutz – nur noch mit Humor zu ertragen

Foto: The Refusers.
Foto: The Refusers.

Foto: Nurses against Vaccines.
Foto: Nurses against Vaccines.

Durchschaue die Matrix!

Ungeimpfte können nichts dafür, daß Geimpfte krank werden:

– Kinderkrankheiten werden nicht durch Viren übertragen

– einen Herdenschutz gibt es nicht

 

Foto: Crunchymamamemes, fair use.
Foto: Crunchymamamemes, fair use.

Foto: RealOrganicTruh, fair use.
Foto: RealOrganicTruh, fair use.

Foto: impflip.com.
Foto: impflip.com.

Scroll to Top