AIDS-HIV

Einer der besten Dokumentarfilme über den Wissenschaftsbetrug mit dem sog. AIDS-Virus HIV von Gary Null, USA 2001

Deconstructing the Myth of AIDS (11 min. excerpt)

Gary Null: Deconstructing the Myth of AIDS (2001) – full documentary, 130 min.

AIDS-HIV

 

AIDS-HIV
Photo: Gary Null, fair use.

„In 1984 we were told that HIV was the cause of AIDS. In his provocative documentary film, “Deconstructing the Myth of AIDS,” Gary Null, Ph.D., challenges virtually every statement ever made by the American medical industrial complex on the virus – including those of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institute for Health (NIH) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

While presenting the findings of Nobel Prize-winning scientists and leading virologists, the film exposes the political maneuvering, conspiracies and cover-ups that have provided obstacles to the study of this human catastrophe from the start.

For example, there are experts who believe that AIDS is the result of multiple factors, including drug use, stress and nutritional deficiency, but that government agencies made a politically strategic decision to de-emphasize these hypotheses and thus discourage certain researchers and their funding.

Meanwhile, AZT, an infamously failed treatment for cancer, and now the primary FDA-approved approach to treating AIDS, is highly toxic and can produce the very symptoms of the illness it is prescribed to treat. “Deconstructing the Myth of AIDS” goes beyond medicine and science to question the very foundation of our reliance on government bureaucracies where it concerns matters of life and death.”

Gary Null reveals the ultimate big corporate cover-up in finding the cure for AIDS. The drug companies dupe over $20 billion from dying people and as of today, not one cure.

How they invented the AIDS virus. One of the best documentaries about the frauf of science with the so-called AIDS causing virus HIV.


DVD Cover:
AIDS-HIV


2001: AIDS was created and funded by the Penmtagon back to 1969

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1970
United States Senate Library

HEARINGS before a SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Ninety-First Congress; First Session; Subcommittee on Department of Defense

  • George H. Mahon, Texas, Chairman
  • Robert L.F. Sikes, Florida, Glenard P. Lipscomb, California
  • Jamie D. Whitten, Mississippi William E. Minshall, Ohio
  • George W. Andrews, Alabama, John J. Rhodes, Arizona
  • Daniel J. Flood, Pennsylvania Glenn R. Davis, Wisconsin
  • John M. Slack, West Virginia, Joseph P. Addabbo, New York
  • Frank E. Evans, Colorado

Temporarily assigned H.B. 15090
PART 5
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
Department of the Army
Statement of Director, Advanced Research Project Agency
Statement of Director, Defense Research and Engineering
__________
Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON: 1969
UNITED STATES SENATE LIBRARY 129; TUESDAY, JULY 1, 1969

SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS
There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.

MR. SIKES. Are we doing any work in that field?
DR. MACARTHUR. We are not.
MR. SIKES. Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest?
DR. MACARTHUR. Certainly not lack of interest.
MR. SIKES. Would you provide for our records information on what would be required, what the advantages of such a program would be. The time and the cost involved?
DR. MACARTHUR. We will be very happy to. The information follows: The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the following observations:

1. All biological agents up the the present time are representatives of naturally occurring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughout the world.
They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes.

2. Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon when we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.

3. A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million.

4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientisis in the field, almost all are in university laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of sciences – National Research Council (NAS-NRC, and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However decreasing funds in CB, growing criticism of the CB program., and our reluctance to involve the NAS NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years.

It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaked lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the ways it could be done. there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program.
AIDS. The Manufactured Virus (2001)


AIDS Virus a Political Disease

AIDS-HIV
AIDS Virus a Political Disease (2001)


2001: The Development of the AIDS Virus was funded in 1969 by Pentagon

AIDS-HIV


The Development of the AIDS Virus was funded in 1969 by Pentagon (2001)


24.08.2010: Dr. Claus Köhnlein: HIV/AIDS-Behandlung: Wo sind die Fakten?
Vortrag auf der alternativen AIDS-Konferenz, auch als unabhängiger Wiener AIDS-Kongress genannt, vom 16.-17.07.2010 im Wiener Museumsquartier als Gegenveranstaltung zur offiziellen 18. Welt-Aids-Konferenz 2010 in Wien. Dr. Claus Köhnlein ist Facharzt für Innere Medizin in Kiel und Co-Autor des Buches Virus-Wahn.

Videobeschreibung:

“AIDS wurde anfang der 80er Jahre als” neues Syndrom” sichtbar. Die “Neuen Krankheiten” waren PCP und Kaposi-Sarkom. Die relativ jungen Patienten waren durchweg Homosexuelle, die Drogenmissbrauch beschrieben. Die ursprüngliche Drogen-AIDS-Hypothese wurde zugunsten der Virus-AIDS-Hypothese verworfen. Der HIV-Antikörpertest kam auf den Markt und machte alle, die positiv auf diesen Antikörper reagierten, zu potentiellen AIDS-Opfern. Die “Seuche” breitete sich fortan durch die seuchenartige Verbreitung des HIV-Testes weiter aus, weniger durch klinisch Erkrankte.

Das 1987 zugelassene Heilmittel AZT war, wie wir heute wissen, zu hoch dosiert, so dass praktisch alle, die das Medikament bekamen, frühzeitig durch Knochenmarksuppression starben.

Diese Übersterblichkeit fiel uns Klinikern zunächst nicht auf, weil wir dachten, dass die Patienten an AIDS sterben.

Erst nach deutlicher Dosisreduktion und Einführung neuer Wirkstoffe (Proteasehemmer) kam es zu einem Rückgang der Sterblichkeit.

Die Akzeptanz der Virus-/AIDS-Hypothese hat dazu geführt, dass Patienten im wesentlichen aufgrund ihres HIV-Status behandelt werden, völlig unabhängig von klinischen Erkrankungen, in vielen Fällen werden eventuell vorhandene Erkrankungen noch zusätzlich behandelt, was zu einer erheblichen Übertherapie führen kann.

Weiterhin wird völlig gesunden HIV-Positiven geraten, sich prophylaktisch behandeln zu lassen und eine lebenslange Chemotherapie empfohlen.

Diese “Leitlinientherapie” ist nicht durch randomisierte, placebokontrollierte Langzeitstudien abgesichert und deshalb als Therapieempfehlung ungeeignet.

Vielmehr sollten HIV-positive Patienten entsprechend ihrer klinischen Erkrankung behandelt werden.

Die mitunter zu beobachtenden Heilerfolge bei schwerkranken HIV-Positiven, die meist an invasiven Mykosen leiden (PCP, Kryptokokkenmeningitis, Histoplasmose) haben ihre Ursache in der guten antimykotischen Wirksamkeit der Proteasehemmer, die in Kombination mit Nukleosidanalogea eine potente antimykotische Wirkstoffkombination darstellen und möglicherweise anderen Antimykotika wie Amphotericin in Kombination mit Ancotil sogar überlegen sind.

Hier (in der Therapie invasiver Mycosen) wären weitere Studien erforderlich, die prüfen, welche Therapieregime langfristig besser vertragen werden.

Dies ist jedoch nicht möglich, ohne die Virus-AIDS-Hypothese in Frage zu stellen, was offenbar, wie jüngste Vorgänge zeigen, nicht möglich ist (Zensur von zwei wissenschaftlichen Veröffentlichungen, die der herrschenden Auffassung von der Ursache des erworbenenen Immundefektsyndroms widersprechen).

– Dr. med. Claus Köhnlein”

2010, RT: HIV/AIDS International Conference Becomes Battleground for Opinions
“I was witness of mass intoxication of the patients with AZT. AZT was the first recommended treatment and we all know today that it was much too high in the dosage. We gave 1500 mg on a daily basis and that virtually killed everybody who took this treatment. That is the reason why everybody believes that HIV is a deadly virus. There is still no proof for this assumption,” says Doctor Claus Koehnlein.

„Ich war Zeuge der Massenvergiftung der Patienten mit AZT. AZT war die erste Behandlung, die empfohlen wurde, und wir wissen heute alle, daß es viel zu hoch dosiert war. Wir haben täglich 1500 mg gegeben, und das hat praktisch jeden getötet, der diese Behandlung bekommen hat. Das ist der Grund, warum alle glauben, daß HIV ein tödliches Virus ist. Für diese Annahme gibt es jedoch immer noch keinen Beweis”, sagt Dr. Claus Köhnlein 2010 bei RT anläßlich der alternativen AIDS-Konferenz in Wien vom 16.-17.07.2010 (Ersatz-Link ist vom 21.07.2010).

Erinnert an die Vergiftungen der Pest-Ärzte mit dem Quecksilbersirup Latwerge, wie es Goethe kurz vor seinem Tod verriet.


10.07.2013: Anthony Fauci on HIV and AIDS in 2025

Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), talks about the prospect of the fight against AIDS out to the year 2025.

2014: Dr. Alan Cantwell: Der Aids Genozid – Massenmord durch Impfen

Foto: Jim Humble Verlag. Mit freundlicher Genehmigung.
Foto: Jim Humble Verlag, fair use.

„Manchmal wünschte ich mir, ich könnte mich in die Zeit zurückversetzen, als ich noch nichts über die von Menschen gemachte Ursache von Aids wusste. Vor dieser Krankheit war ich optimistischer und hoffnungsvoller, was die Zukunft betraf. Ich glaubte noch an die höchsten Ideale der medizinischen Wissenschaft, und ich vertraute darauf, dass meine Kollegen das Richtige tun würden.“

Anfang der achtziger Jahre erkrankten Millionen afrikanische Männer, Frauen und Kinder innerhalb kürzester Zeit an Aids. Einige Monate davor hatte die WHO ein Polio-Impfprogramm durchgeführt und Millionen Menschen in Afrika gegen Polio geimpft. Im Jahr 1978 ließen sich hunderttausende Homosexuelle in den amerikanischen Städten freiwillig gegen Hepatitis B impfen. Kurze Zeit später starben die ersten Männer in Amerika an Aids. Die Wissenschaft hält bis heute an der Theorie fest, dass das Aidsvirus von den Affen auf den Menschen übergegangen ist.

Wusste man nicht über die verunreinigten Impfstoffe Bescheid, oder ist Aids ein bewusster Genozid? Was hat die Wissenschaft vor uns zu verbergen? Dr. Alan Cantwell ist der Sache nachgegangen und kam zu erschreckenden Ergebnissen.

Leserprobe


c. 2014: Dr Len Horowitz Slams Medical Conspirators For High Treason
To gain a better understanding of the Hows and Whys of Psychological Warfare, see “Psychological warfare, communication research, and the media” by Dr. Francisco Gil-White.

Nearly half of Americans subscribe to medical conspiracy theories purposely discredited. This shocking short film by world leading drug industry whistleblower, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz, “slam dunks” the propaganda issued by scientists and Western intelligence agents committing treason against the United States and other nations, killing people worldwide through the laboratory creation and vaccine transmission of HIV/AIDS. “Who’s making the money?” this Harvard-trained behavioral scientist and public health expert in emerging diseases asks.

The answer is made certain by his evidence exposing the “yellow presses” of the American Medical Association and Wall Street. Dr. Horowitz produced this outstanding and courageous opposition to his own smearing by Wikipedia and other “agencies of deception” working with the CIA and National Security Agency to misinform and control populations through their propaganda. Public polling, in this case, provides a “pseudoscience protection racket for drug industry profits” through the widely publicized study by University of Chicago political scientists, J. Eric Oliver, PhD, and Thomas Wood, MA.

Their propaganda defrauds people, diverts from the covered-up facts, “smoking guns,” and potential cures for the disease generated by multi-national corporate-controlled governments for profit and population control. Proving HIV/AIDS was man-made, Dr. Horowitz shows you evidence of the most taboo subject of all in AIDS science–the use of contaminated CHIMPANZEES to produce the earliest hepatitis B vaccine studies using gay men in New York City who became the earliest, most heavily killed, victims of this treason.

Horowitz expresses his outrage over the propagandists’ false claim that “medical conspiracists” are mentally ill, or “cognitively blocking” “normal” thinking. Writing as a world-leading “medical conspiracist,” objecting to the JAMA article: “Medical Conspiracy Theories and Health Behaviors in the United States,” he exposes the United States Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Chicago-based Tribute Company, owner of the Los Angeles Times, for committing “iatrogenocide”–mass murder with catastrophic social and economic consequences.

he medical conspiracy theories article, headlined by Melissa Healy for the Times, titled, “Nearly half of Americans subscribe to a medical conspiracy theory,” is outrageously misleading, scientifically erroneous, transparently commercial, and treasonous as it aids-and-abets doctor-induced mortality and morbidity ongoing in the AIDS genocide, and beyond, Dr. Horowitz reports.

“Every reasonably intelligent health behaviorist, or even veteran journalist, knows that questions determine answers, and the way questions are phrased determines people’s responses,” Dr. Horowitz explains with evidence proving consumer fraud by the political scientists serving the CIA and NSA’s public persuasion and population management agendas.

As the author of the award-winning book, “Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional?,” Dr. Horowitz explores the CIA—HIV/AIDS conspiracy “theory” most thoroughly among all treatments of this taboo subject.

His findings corroborate Dr. Alan Cantwell’s conclusions pursuant to the hepatitis b vaccine transmissions of HIV/AIDS killing mostly initially gay men in New York City. The major “cognitive shortcut” in the fraudulent conclusions drawn by Oliver and Wood, Dr. Horowitz explains, is their polling question: “The CIA deliberately infected large numbers of African Americans with HIV under the guise of a hepatitis inoculation program.”

“No reasonably informed person would answer ‘yes’ to such a false and misleading question,” he says.

Alternatively, the more honest related question that received overwhelming public agreement was, “The Food and Drug Administration is deliberately preventing the public from getting natural cures for cancer and other diseases because of pressure from drug companies.” The U of C study design was purposely flawed to obfuscate this most controversial matter, Dr. Horowitz reports, using the media’s propaganda to evidence an organized criminal conspiracy to sustain the drug-industry’s genocidal monopoly over “healthcare.” “In conclusion, the aforementioned purveyors of propaganda should be more than ashamed of themselves,” Dr. Horowitz condemns. “They should be tried and convicted for high treason and mass murder.”

CLICK THE FOLLOWING LINK to read more with links to the referenced articles: Medical Conspiracy Theories and Media Behaviors – War On We The People: (archive.org).

 

2014: MEDICAL CONSPIRACY THEORIES AND MEDIA BEHAVIORS
NEARLY HALF OF AMERICANS SUBSCRIBE TO MEDICAL CONSPIRACY THEORIES PURPOSELY DISCREDITED.

AIDS-HIV
Photo: Horowitz, fair use.

BY DR. LEONARD G. HOROWITZ

I am writing as a Harvard School of Public Health-trained behavioral scientist and world-leading “medical conspiracist,” objecting to the JAMA article: “Medical Conspiracy Theories and Health Behaviors in the United States” by J. Eric Oliver, PhD, and Thomas Wood, MA, from the Department of Political Science at the University of Chicago. This propaganda is being heavily publicized by the Chicago-based Tribute Company, owner of the Los Angeles Times, with catastrophic social and economic consequences.

The medical conspiracy theories article, headlined by Melissa Healy for the Times, titled, “Nearly half of Americans subscribe to a medical conspiracy theory,” is outrageously misleading, scientifically erroneous, transparently commercial, and treasonous as it aids-and-abets iatrogenic [i.e., doctor caused] mortality and morbidity ongoing in the AIDS genocide, and beyond.

Every reasonably intelligent health behaviorist, or even veteran journalist, knows that questions determine answers, and the way questions are phrased determines people’s responses. “Political science” and campaign polling is jaded by this well established and widely known fact, albeit constantly abused for public persuasion and population management.

As the author of the award-winning book, Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional?, that explores the CIA—HIV/AIDS conspiracy “theory” most thoroughly among all treatments of this taboo subject, my research corroborates Dr. Alan Cantwell’s conclusions pursuant to the hepatitis b vaccine transmissions of HIV/AIDS killing gay men in New York City.

Cantwell’s and my works have been criminally neglected by the scientific establishment, and grossly obfuscated by disinformation agents and campaigns smearing origin of HIV/AIDS theorists who have contributed most to the developing public consensus that HIV/AIDS is a man-made disease associated with a CIA-linked vaccination genocide. Thus, I object to the American Medical Association’s and Tribune Company’s alliance in further disseminating false and misleading information and the fraudulently-obtained data misinterpreted and misrepresented by Oliver and Wood.

I especially oppose the fraudulent diagnosis heralded by these agents of yellow presses that “‘most individuals who endorse these” medical conspiracy theories” are “otherwise normal,” but “use a sort of cognitive shortcut to explain complex and confusing events.”

The major “cognitive shortcut” in the fraudulent conclusions drawn by Oliver and Wood appears in their polling question: “The CIA deliberately infected large numbers of African Americans with HIV under the guise of a hepatitis inoculation program.” No reasonably informed person would answer “yes” to such a false and misleading question.

Alternatively, the more honest related question that received overwhelming agreement was, “The Food and Drug Administration is deliberately preventing the public from getting natural cures for cancer and other diseases because of pressure from drug companies.”

As noted by Dr. Cantwell, no legitimate social scientist would have drafted this deceptive CIA/AIDS question, since the targeted population in America was not “African Americans,” but mainly and initially gay men in New York City.

AIDS-HIV
Photo: Horowitz, fair use.

Likewise, I claim the University of Chicago political science study is transparently contrived to defraud people, divert from the substantive, evidence-based, facts supporting the man-made origin of HIV/AIDS theory. The U of C study design was purposely flawed to obfuscate this most controversial matter. I make this claim because of what is widely published on the Internet, reflecting widespread public knowledge of the CIA’s links to the AIDS outbreak, published mainly by me according to WikiPedia, a widely known mouthpiece for the CIA’s propaganda.

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

Nach oben scrollen